Update on Overleaf.

cau-ath-req-0004_i1-0/cau-requirements.tex

@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ This section contains requirements from \ac{AHEPaM} on the \ac{ATHENA} spacecraf
 
 \subsection*{R-CAU-AHEPaM-001: Unobstructed Field of View}
 \label{req:CAU-R-001}
-The opening angle of AHEPaM is $\phi=$20.5 degrees (half-angle) on both sides of the telescope (see MICD \cite{ahepam-micd}). The solid angle described by these cones shall not be obstructed by more than 10\%.
+The opening angle of AHEPaM is $\phi=20.5$\,degrees (half-angle) on both sides of the telescope (see \ac{MICD} \cite{ahepam-micd}). The solid angle described by these cones shall not be obstructed by more than 10\%.
 %The field of view of both viewing directions of AHEPaM shall be only obstructed by small objects such as the spacecrafts booms in an opening angle of 20.6 degrees.
 
 %\subsection*{R-CAU-AHEPaM-002: Purging}
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ The opening angle of AHEPaM is $\phi=$20.5 degrees (half-angle) on both sides of
 
 \subsection*{R-CAU-AHEPaM-002: Particle Detector Temperature}
 \label{req:CAU-R-002}
-The design temperature of \acs{AHEPaM}s particle detectors shall not exceed 0$^\circ$C $\pm$ TBD$^\circ$C.\\
+The design temperature of \acs{AHEPaM}s particle detectors shall not exceed $0\,^\circ$C $\pm$ \acs{TBD}$\,^\circ$C.\\
 
 This requirement can be achieved by an adequate thermal design which bases on a mutual understanding between the prime and the instrument team regarding the detailed environmental thermal constraints. Most likely a certain combination of external radiators and op-/ non-op heating power will be required.\\
 
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ This requirement will be further specified, once the tailored thermal constraint
 \subsection*{R-CAU-AHEPaM-003: GN2-Purge}
 \label{req:CAU-R-003}
 \acs{AHEPaM} will require GN2-Purge during storage.\newline
-Max. allowed time without purge in a cleanroom environment shall not exceed TBD 2 hrs.
+Max. allowed time without purge in a cleanroom environment shall not exceed \acs{TBD} 2\,hrs.
 
 
 

cau-ath-req-0004_i1-0/electrical-thermal-mechanical-requirements.tex

@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
 %----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 \subsection*{R-AHEPaM-034: Power}
 \label{req:R-034}
-The power consumption of the unit shall be $\le$ 15 W continuous load. 
+The power consumption of the unit shall be $\le 15\,$W continuous load. 
 
 \paragraph{Justification:} ESA-ATHENA-ESTEC-PL-SP-0001, ATHENA AHEPaM Specification
 
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ The power consumption of the unit shall be $\le$ 15 W continuous load.
 
 \paragraph{Comments:} The peak power may be higher (currently unspecified).
 
-\paragraph{CAU Response:} The power consumption of the AHEPaM unit will be $\le$ 15W in continuous load.
+\paragraph{CAU Response:} The power consumption of the AHEPaM unit will be $\le 15\,$W in continuous load.
 
 %----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 \subsection*{R-AHEPaM-035: Power interface}
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ The AHEPaM shall be powered through the SC power interface. It is also used to t
     ON\_CMD &  HCL command to turn the unit ON \\
     OFF\_CMD &  HCL command to turn the unit OFF\\
     ON\_OFF\_status &  Status of the unit\\
-    Primary bus voltage &  Primary bus (+28.0 V or +50.0 V)\\\hline
+    Primary bus voltage &  Primary bus (+28.0\,V or +50.0\,V)\\\hline
     \end{tabular}
 \end{center}
 
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ The AHEPaM shall be powered through the SC power interface. It is also used to t
 
 \paragraph{Verification:} Analysis/Test
 
-\paragraph{Comments:} Unit power interface is designed for +28.0V.
+\paragraph{Comments:} Unit power interface is designed for +28.0\,V.
 
 \paragraph{CAU Response:} The proposed part Teledyne TR-HIREL-1/422
 from ESA-ATHENA-ESTEC-PL-SP-0001 will be used for ON/OFF command and unit status.
@@ -44,9 +44,9 @@ from ESA-ATHENA-ESTEC-PL-SP-0001 will be used for ON/OFF command and unit status
 %----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 \subsection*{R-AHEPaM-036: ON/OFF}
 \label{req:R-036}
-The AHEPaM shall be switched ON using a high-voltage high power command (HV-HPC)
+The AHEPaM shall be switched ON using a high-voltage high power command (HV-HPC) %ac
-The AHEPaM shall be turned OFF using a high-voltage high power command (HV-HPC)
+The AHEPaM shall be turned OFF using a high-voltage high power command (HV-HPC) %ac
-The status (ON/OFF) of the AHEPaM shall be monitored using a 422 relay. The interface standard is a bi-level standard monitor (BSM)
+The status (ON/OFF) of the AHEPaM shall be monitored using a 422 relay. The interface standard is a bi-level standard monitor (BSM) %ac
 
 \paragraph{Justification:} ESA-ATHENA-ESTEC-PL-SP-0001, ATHENA AHEPaM Specification
 
@@ -59,20 +59,20 @@ The status (ON/OFF) of the AHEPaM shall be monitored using a 422 relay. The inte
 %----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 \subsection*{R-AHEPaM-037: Primary bus voltage}
 \label{req:R-037}
-The AHEPaM power interface shall be compatible with a primary bus voltage of either +28V or +50V. 
+The AHEPaM power interface shall be compatible with a primary bus voltage of either +28\,V or +50\,V. 
 
 \paragraph{Justification:} ESA-ATHENA-ESTEC-PL-SP-0001, ATHENA AHEPaM Specification
 
 \paragraph{Verification:} Analysis/Test
 
-\paragraph{Comments:} Unit power interface is designed for +28.0V.
+\paragraph{Comments:} Unit power interface is designed for +28.0\,V.
 
-\paragraph{CAU Response:} +28.0V is the input voltage of our choice.
+\paragraph{CAU Response:} +28.0\,V is the input voltage of our choice.
 
 %----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 \subsection*{R-AHEPaM-038: Data rate}
 \label{req:R-038}
-The data-generation rate of the AHEPaM shall be up to 1 kbps (adjustable).
+The data-generation rate of the AHEPaM shall be up to 1\,kbps (adjustable).
 
 \paragraph{Justification:} 
 
@@ -89,8 +89,8 @@ The operating and non-operating temperature limits required by the AHEPaM are:
 
 \begin{center}
     \begin{tabular}{|lr|}\hline
-Non-Operating: &-50$^\circ$ to +50$^\circ$\\
+Non-Operating: & $-50\,^\circ$C to $+50\,^\circ$C\\
-Operating : & -40$^\circ$ to +40$^\circ$\\\hline
+Operating : & $-40\,^\circ$C to $+40\,^\circ$C\\\hline
     \end{tabular}
 \end{center}
 
@@ -99,8 +99,8 @@ Operating : & -40$^\circ$ to +40$^\circ$\\\hline
 \paragraph{Verification:} Analysis/Test
 
 \paragraph{Comments:}
-The driving force behind \acs{AHEPaM}'s thermal design is to keep its particle detectors at the design temperature at 0$^{\circ}$C. The second limiting threshold for the moment is the \acs{PMT}'s cold op/ non-op temperature of -30$^{\circ}$C . While the first is a requirement that directly influences \acs{AHEPaM}'s performance, the second stems from the manufacturer's data sheet and is currently under investigation.\newline
+The driving force behind \acs{AHEPaM}'s thermal design is to keep its particle detectors at the design temperature at $0\,^{\circ}$C. The second limiting threshold for the moment is the \acs{PMT}'s cold op/ non-op temperature of -30$^{\circ}$C . While the first is a requirement that directly influences \acs{AHEPaM}'s performance, the second stems from the manufacturer's data sheet and is currently under investigation.\newline
-However the initial \acs{TMM} \cite{ahepam-djf} shows, that the instrument design can be adapted in order to withstand the required hot op and non-op temperatures. The results indicate that the instrument might, besides its surfaces which will be used as radiators, require external radiators in the range of A$_{RAD}$=0.01..0.03$m^2$ assuming direct solar illumination at 1 AU. This would furthermore result in required operational heating power.\newline
+However the initial \ac{TMM} \cite{ahepam-djf} shows, that the instrument design can be adapted in order to withstand the required hot op and non-op temperatures. The results indicate that the instrument might, besides its surfaces which will be used as radiators, require external radiators in the range of A$_{\mathrm{RAD}}$=0.01..0.03\,m$^2$ assuming direct solar illumination at 1\,AU. This would furthermore result in required operational heating power.\newline
 %This strongly depends on the level of external heat intake of the unit, which is, at this point, just an assumption to understand the fundamental behaviour of the proposed instrument design. 
 
 \paragraph{CAU Response:} Open. The instrument team expresses the necessity for a detailed discussion about the detailed thermal constraints imposed to the instrument. The most important aspect is the amount of external heat applied to the unit by e.g. solar illumination.
@@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ However the initial \acs{TMM} \cite{ahepam-djf} shows, that the instrument desig
 %----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 \subsection*{R-AHEPaM-040: Thermal IF area}
 \label{req:R-040}
-The conductive thermal interface of the AHEPaM box shall be maintained within a maximum of 75,000 mm$^2$ (PRODUCT LENGTH.WIDTH)
+The conductive thermal interface of the AHEPaM box shall be maintained within a maximum of 75'000\,mm$^2$ (PRODUCT LENGTH.WIDTH)
 
 
 \paragraph{Justification:} 
@@ -122,12 +122,12 @@ The conductive thermal interface of the AHEPaM box shall be maintained within a
 %----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 \subsection*{R-AHEPaM-041: \acs{AHEPaM} TRP}
 \label{req:R-041}
-The conductive thermal interface shall be set so that the AHEPaM TRP is maintained within OP ranges (-40$^\circ$C/+40$^\circ$C):\\
+The conductive thermal interface shall be set so that the AHEPaM \ac{TRP} is maintained within OP ranges ($-40\,^\circ$C / $+40\,^\circ$C):\\ %\ac{OP}
 
 \begin{center}
     \begin{tabular}{|lr|}\hline
-Worst hot case: &TRP shall be set at +40$^\circ$C\\
+Worst hot case: & TRP shall be set at $+40\,^\circ$C\\
-Worst cold case: & TRP shall be set at -40$^\circ$C\\\hline
+Worst cold case: & TRP shall be set at $-40\,^\circ$C\\\hline
     \end{tabular}
 \end{center}
 
@@ -150,14 +150,14 @@ The radiative thermal interface of the AHEPaM box is N/A
 
 \paragraph{Verification:} 
 
-\paragraph{Comments:} The instrument team does not understands the 'not applicable' status of a radiative thermal interface, because radiative coupling is a physical principle.
+\paragraph{Comments:} The instrument team does not understands the ``not applicable'' status of a radiative thermal interface, because radiative coupling is a physical principle.
 
 \paragraph{CAU Response:} Open. Please provide further details to understand the text of the requirement.
 %----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
 \subsection*{R-AHEPaM-043: Thermal design}
 \label{req:R-043}
-The thermal design shall ensure that all internal components, material and processes are compatible with the NOP range (-50$^\circ$C/+50$^\circ$C), when the unit is OFF.
+The thermal design shall ensure that all internal components, material and processes are compatible with the NOP range ($-50\,^\circ$C / $+50\,^\circ$C), when the unit is OFF. %\ac{NOP}
 
 
 \paragraph{Justification:} 
@@ -171,7 +171,7 @@ The thermal design shall ensure that all internal components, material and proce
 %----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 \subsection*{R-AHEPaM-044: Thermal stability}
 \label{req:R-044}
-The conductive interface short term temperature stability shall be 1$^\circ$C (tbc) for the duration of the measurement.
+The conductive interface short term temperature stability shall be 1\,$^\circ$C (\acs{TBC}) for the duration of the measurement.
 
 
 \paragraph{Justification:} 
@@ -180,7 +180,7 @@ The conductive interface short term temperature stability shall be 1$^\circ$C (t
 
 \paragraph{Comments:} See the CAU response below.
 
-\paragraph{CAU Response:} The instrument asks for clarification: What does "for the duration of the measurement" mean? We expect \ac{AHEPaM} to be ON at all times. \ac{GCR} fluxes are low and we can not achieve the required measurement statistics if \acs{AHEPaM} is OFF for a substantial fraction of the operational time.
+\paragraph{CAU Response:} The instrument asks for clarification: What does ``for the duration of the measurement'' mean? We expect \ac{AHEPaM} to be ON at all times. \ac{GCR} fluxes are low and we can not achieve the required measurement statistics if \acs{AHEPaM} is OFF for a substantial fraction of the operational time.
 
 %----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 \subsection*{R-AHEPaM-045: Conductive IF stability}
@@ -199,7 +199,7 @@ The conductive interface long term stability is N/A
 %----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 \subsection*{R-AHEPaM-046: Conductive IF temperature gradient}
 \label{req:R-046}
-The conductive interface temperature gradient shall not exceed 3$^\circ$C (tbc)  
+The conductive interface temperature gradient shall not exceed 3\,$^\circ$C (\acs{TBC})  
 
 
 \paragraph{Justification:} 
@@ -213,17 +213,17 @@ The conductive interface temperature gradient shall not exceed 3$^\circ$C (tbc)
 %----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 \subsection*{R-AHEPaM-047: \acs{AHEPaM} mass}
 \label{req:R-047}
-The total Nominal Mass (unit Basic Mass + DMM) of the AHEPaM shall be $\le$15 kg (TBC). kg. The location of the CoG can be considered at the geometric centroid of the defined volume.
+The total Nominal Mass (unit Basic Mass + DMM) of the AHEPaM shall be $\le$15\,kg (\acs{TBC}). The location of the \ac{CoG} can be considered at the geometric centroid of the defined volume. %\acs{DMM}
 
 
 \paragraph{Justification:} 
 
 \paragraph{Verification:} Analysis
 
-\paragraph{Comments:} The requirement is clear for the mass allocation. The CoG part seems to be missing a radius for the stated centroid in order to check compliance of \acs{AHEPaM} against it.
+\paragraph{Comments:} The requirement is clear for the mass allocation. The \ac{CoG} part seems to be missing a radius for the stated centroid in order to check compliance of \acs{AHEPaM} against it.
 
 \paragraph{CAU Response:} The instrument design is complient with the requirment regarding the mass allocation.\newline
-Please provide a radius for the stated centroid. However - due to its symmetric shape, the instrument's CoG will be close to the center of its envelope in XY direction. Due to the heavy \acs{BGO}s, the Z position will likely vary.
+Please provide a radius for the stated centroid. However -- due to its symmetric shape, the instrument's \ac{CoG} will be close to the center of its envelope in XY direction. Due to the heavy \acs{BGO}s, the Z position will likely vary.
 
 %----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 \subsection*{R-AHEPaM-048: Dimensions}
@@ -236,9 +236,9 @@ Parameter & Value & Unit \\\hline
 Length & 300 & mm \\
 Width & 250 & mm \\
 Maximum height & 200 & mm \\
-Volume & 15,000,000 & mm$^3$ \\ 
+Volume & 15'000'000 & mm$^3$ \\ 
-Mounting area$^*$ &  92,400 & mm$^2$ \\\hline
+Mounting area$^*$ &  92'400 & mm$^2$ \\\hline
-\multicolumn{3}{l}{*Include 20 mm boundary for mounting feet.}
+\multicolumn{3}{l}{*Include 20\,mm boundary for mounting feet.}
  \end{tabular}
  \end{center}
 
@@ -254,15 +254,15 @@ Mounting area$^*$ &  92,400 & mm$^2$ \\\hline
 \paragraph{Comments:} None.
 
 \paragraph{CAU Response:} Not compliant for maximum height and volume.\newline
-\acs{AHEPaM} will exceed the allocated volume box by 35,2mm in (instrument's) Z direction.\newline
+\acs{AHEPaM} will exceed the allocated volume box by 35,2\,mm in (instrument's) Z direction.\newline
-It will exceed the allocated volume by 2,909,539 mm$^2$. However, this just applies to the projected envelope box and not to the real volume consumed by the structur.\\
+It will exceed the allocated volume by 2'909'539 mm$^2$. However, this just applies to the projected envelope box and not to the real volume consumed by the structure.\\
 
-Please refer to the MICD \cite{ahepam-micd} for details.
+Please refer to the \ac{MICD} \cite{ahepam-micd} for details. %M-Mechanical Interface Control Document.
 
 %----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 \subsection*{R-AHEPaM-110: Global resonance}
 \label{req:R-110}
-The Unit shall have a hard-mounted 1st global resonance $\geq$140 Hz.
+The Unit shall have a hard-mounted 1st global resonance $\geq$140\,Hz.
 
 
 \paragraph{Justification:} Generic for small units. To stay out of low-frequency sinusoidal and transient dynamic excitation.
@@ -278,9 +278,9 @@ The Unit shall have a hard-mounted 1st global resonance $\geq$140 Hz.
 \subsection*{R-AHEPaM-120: Design limit load}
 \label{req:R-120}
 The Unit shall be dimensioned considering the following Design Limit Load that may act in any direction:
-30g.
+30\,g.
 
-\paragraph{Justification:} Generic for small units in a mass range from 10-20kg. Derived from Mass Acceleration Curve (MAC, NASA-HDBK-7005).
+\paragraph{Justification:} Generic for small units in a mass range from 10-20\,kg. Derived from Mass Acceleration Curve (MAC, NASA-HDBK-7005). %cite
 
 \paragraph{Verification:} Analysis/Test
 
@@ -291,17 +291,17 @@ The Unit shall be dimensioned considering the following Design Limit Load that m
 %----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 \subsection*{R-AHEPaM-130: Shock environment}
 \label{req:R-130}
-The Unit shall be designed to meet performance requirements following exposure to the externally induced qualification shock environment at the Unit interface specified in the table below (TBC):
+The Unit shall be designed to meet performance requirements following exposure to the externally induced qualification shock environment at the Unit interface specified in the table below (\acs{TBC}):
 
 \begin{center}
 \begin{tabular}{|lr|}\hline
-100 Hz    &              20g\\
+100\,Hz    &              20\,g\\
-400 Hz     &           350g\\
+400\,Hz     &           350\,g\\
-10000 Hz    &       350g\\\hline
+10000\,Hz    &       350\,g\\\hline
 \end{tabular}
 \end{center}
 
-\paragraph{Justification:} Preliminary estimate for Unit in SVM considering S/C clampband release and SA HDRM release shock sources.
+\paragraph{Justification:} Preliminary estimate for Unit in SVM considering S/C clampband release and SA HDRM release shock sources. %\ac{SVM} \ac{SA} \ac{HDRM}
 
 
 \paragraph{Verification:} Analysis/Test
@@ -313,10 +313,10 @@ The Unit shall be designed to meet performance requirements following exposure t
 %----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 \subsection*{R-AHEPaM-140: Sine vibration}
 \label{req:R-140}
-The AHEPaM Unit shall sustain the following sinusoidal vibration qualification levels with a qualification sweep rate of 2 Oct/min.:
+The AHEPaM Unit shall sustain the following sinusoidal vibration qualification levels with a qualification sweep rate of 2\,Oct/min.:
 
 \begin{center}
-    Lateral \& Axial: 5-100 Hz: 30 g
+    Lateral \& Axial: 5-100\,Hz: 30\,g
 
 \end{center}
 
@@ -327,26 +327,26 @@ No notching allowed unless agreed by the Agency.
 
 \begin{center}
 \begin{tabular}{|lr|}\hline
-Frequency: & $\pm$ 2\% (or ±1 Hz whichever is greater)\\
+Frequency: & $\pm 2\%$ (or $\pm1\,$Hz whichever is greater)\\
-Amplitude: & $\pm$ 10\%\\
+Amplitude: & $\pm 10\%$\\
-Sweep rate (Oct/min): & $\pm$ 5\% \\\hline
+Sweep rate (Oct/min): & $\pm 5\%$ \\\hline
 \end{tabular}
 \end{center}
 
 
 \paragraph{Verification:} Analysis/Test
 
-\paragraph{Comments:} The amplitude of 30g seems to be very high.
+\paragraph{Comments:} The amplitude of 30\,g seems to be very high.
 
-\paragraph{CAU Response:} The instrument team asks for a verification of the amplitude value of 30 g.
+\paragraph{CAU Response:} The instrument team asks for a verification of the amplitude value of 30\,g.
 
 %----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 \subsection*{R-AHEPaM-150: Accoustic environment}
 \label{req:R-150}
-The Unit shall sustain the acoustic Sound Pressure Level (\ac{SPL}) spectrum defined in the [Ariane 6 User's Manual].
+The Unit shall sustain the acoustic \ac{SPL} spectrum defined in the [Ariane 6 User's Manual].
 
 
-\paragraph{Justification:} 1:1 copy of the SPL spectrum in A-6 MUA.
+\paragraph{Justification:} 1:1 copy of the \ac{SPL} spectrum in A-6 MUA. %\ac{MUA}
 
 \paragraph{Verification:} Open. 
 
@@ -363,25 +363,25 @@ The Unit shall sustain the following random vibration qualification levels:
 \begin{center}
 \begin{tabular}{|lr|}
 \multicolumn{2}{l}{Lateral \& Axial:} \\\hline
-20-100 Hz   &              +3dB/Oct\\
+20-100\,Hz   &              $+3\,$dB/Oct\\
-100-300 Hz  &             0.263 g$^2$/Hz\\
+100-300\,Hz  &             0.263\,g$^2$/Hz\\
-300-2000 Hz &            -5dB/Oct\\
+300-2000\,Hz &            $-5\,$dB/Oct\\
-rms:        &                   12.2 g\\\hline
+rms:        &                   12.2\,g\\\hline
 \end{tabular}
 \end{center}
 
-The duration of the qualification tests is 2 min for all three axes.
+The duration of the qualification tests is 2\,min for all three axes.
 Notching is not allowed unless agreed by the Agency.
 
 
-\paragraph{Justification:} The specification is taken from ECSS-E-10-03A(15Feb2002).
+\paragraph{Justification:} The specification is taken from \ac{ECSS}-E-10-03A(15Feb2002).
 
 \begin{center}
 \begin{tabular}{|lr|}
 \multicolumn{2}{l}{Tolerances (ECSS-E-ST-10-03C):} \\\hline
-20-1000 Hz: & -1 dB / +3 dB \\
+20-1000\,Hz: & $-1\,$dB / $+3\,$dB \\
-1000-2000 Hz: & $\pm$ 3 dB \\
+1000-2000\,Hz: & $\pm 3\,$dB \\
-Overall grms: & $\pm$10\% \\\hline
+Overall grms: & $\pm 10\%$ \\\hline
 \end{tabular}
 \end{center}
 

cau-ath-req-0004_i1-0/general-design-requirements.tex

@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ The instrument design complies with the requirement.
 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 \subsection*{R-SC-AHEPaM-043: Moments of Inertia}
 \label{req:R-043}
-The AHEPaM \ac{MoI} (Moments of Inertia) shall be determined referring to a coordinate system parallel to the AHEPaM\_PCS and with the origin at the AHEPaM \ac{CoG}.
+The AHEPaM \ac{MoI} shall be determined referring to a coordinate system parallel to the AHEPaM\_PCS and with the origin at the AHEPaM \ac{CoG}.
 
 \paragraph{Justification:} 
 Compliance.
@@ -76,16 +76,16 @@ The document \textit{Margin Policy Document} which is stated in the requirement'
 However the instrument team likes to comment that a design policy is applied which baselines ECSS-E-ST-10-02C Rev.1, 1 February 2018, Table 5-1. The detailed description can be found in \cite{ahepam-ddv}.
 
 \paragraph{CAU Response:} 
-TBC compliant, after ESA's review of the the applied margin philosophy in \cite{ahepam-ddv}.
+\acs{TBC} compliant, after ESA's review of the the applied margin philosophy in \cite{ahepam-ddv}.
 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 \subsection*{R-SC-AHEPaM-342: \acs{ECSS} Standards}
 \label{req:R-342}
-The AHEPaM shall conform to the published list of ESA approved standards [ECSS] for the E, Q, and M branch.
+The AHEPaM shall conform to the published list of ESA approved \acf{ECSS} for the E, Q, and M branch.
 
 \paragraph{Justification:} 
 Compliance
 \paragraph{Verification:}
-Review of documentation referencing to the relevant ECSS documents.
+Review of documentation referencing to the relevant \ac{ECSS} documents.
 
 \paragraph{Comments:} 
 None.
@@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ Compliant.
 \subsection*{R-SC-AHEPaM-343: Radiation design margin}
 \label{req:R-343}
 
-The AHEPaM shall use a Radiation Design Margin (RDM) factor 2 for the assessment of the Total Ionizing Dose effects.
+The AHEPaM shall use a \acf{RDM} factor 2 for the assessment of the Total Ionizing Dose effects. %Radiation Design Margin
 
 \paragraph{Justification:} ESA-ATHENA-ESTEC-PL-SP-0001, ATHENA AHEPaM Specification
 

cau-ath-req-0004_i1-0/mission-reqs.tex

@@ -1,23 +1,23 @@
 \section{Mission Lifetime \& Storage}
 \label{sec:mission}
 
-This section contains the Athena mission lifetime and storage requirements.
+This section contains the \ac{ATHENA} mission lifetime and storage requirements.
 
 \subsection*{R-AHEPaM-012: In-orbit lifetime}
 \label{req:R-012}
-The \acs{AHEPaM} shall be compatible with an overall in-orbit lifetime of 4.25 years.
+The \ac{AHEPaM} shall be compatible with an overall in-orbit lifetime of 4.25\,years.
 
 \paragraph{Justification:} ConOps part B MBD [DDF\_1.0]
 
 \paragraph{Verification:} Design/Analysis
 
-\paragraph{Comments:} Four years nominal mission plus 3 months for LEOP, transfer, and commissioning.
+\paragraph{Comments:} Four years nominal mission plus 3\,months for \ac{LEOP}, transfer, and commissioning.
 
 \paragraph{CAU Response:} OK
 
 \subsection*{G-AHEPaM-011: In-orbit lifetime}
 \label{req:G-011}
-The \acs{AHEPaM} should be compatible with an overall in-orbit lifetime of 5.25 years.
+The \acs{AHEPaM} should be compatible with an overall in-orbit lifetime of 5.25\,years.
 
 \paragraph{Justification:} ConOps part B MBD [DDF\_1.0]
 
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ The \acs{AHEPaM} should be compatible with an overall in-orbit lifetime of 5.25
 
 \subsection*{R-AHEPaM-013: Storage}
 \label{req:R-013}
-The \acs{AHEPaM} shall be compatible with a storage duration of 2 years.
+The \acs{AHEPaM} shall be compatible with a storage duration of 2\,years.
 
 \paragraph{Justification:} To provide schedule robustness against delays.
 

cau-ath-req-0004_i1-0/performance-requirements.tex

@@ -5,18 +5,18 @@ This section contains the AHEPaM measurement requirements.
 %----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 \subsection*{R-AHEPaM-020: Proton energy range}
 \label{req:R-020}
-The AHEPaM shall measure proton fluxes between 0.1 GeV and 2.0 GeV in at least 5 energy bands.
+The AHEPaM shall measure proton fluxes between 0.1\,GeV and 2.0\,GeV in at least 5 energy bands.
 
-\paragraph{Justification:} Requirements for the ATHENA High Energy Particle Monitor AHEPaM [Molendi et al. 2020, issue 2.2]
+\paragraph{Justification:} Requirements for the \acf{AHEPaM} \cite[][, Molendi et al. 2020, issue 2.2]{molendi-etal-2020}
 
 
 \paragraph{Verification:} Analysis/Test
 
 
-\paragraph{Comments:} The required 5 energy bands for protons are driven by the need to sample the varying response of these particles to the Solar cycle as a function of energy. The division should roughly follow the energy distribution of primaries as estimated via simulations and should account for the fact that temporal variations are stronger at lower than at higher energies, see Sect. 5 of the TN for more details. An indicative break up of energy bands would be: 0.1-0.3, 0.3-0.6, 0.6-0.8, 0.8-1.0, 1.0-2.0 (all expressed in GeV). Cosmic-Ray protons feature a continuum spectrum which implies that small gaps or superpositions between adjacent energy bands do not constitute a problem.
+\paragraph{Comments:} The required 5 energy bands for protons are driven by the need to sample the varying response of these particles to the Solar cycle as a function of energy. The division should roughly follow the energy distribution of primaries as estimated via simulations and should account for the fact that temporal variations are stronger at lower than at higher energies, see section~5 of the TN for more details. An indicative break up of energy bands would be: 0.1-0.3, 0.3-0.6, 0.6-0.8, 0.8-1.0, 1.0-2.0 (all expressed in GeV). Cosmic-Ray protons feature a continuum spectrum which implies that small gaps or superpositions between adjacent energy bands do not constitute a problem. %\acf{TN} 
 
 
-\paragraph{CAU Response:} Providing several energy bands can be easily achieved. The different proton boxes introduced in the performance analysis in \cite{ahepam-djf} can be separated for different measured total energies (stopping) and deposited energies (penetrating particles). The performance analysis has shown that \ac{AHEPaM} will be able to measure protons over the entire required energy range. The amount of energy bands we can provide is only limited by statistics. The data is required to be send down at higher cadence and energy resolution not only to provide an accurate proton spectrum but for the purpose of correcting the electron spectrum. Based on this raw data, the required spectra in different resolutions as well as a deconvolution of the data based on the response functions determined form \ac{GEANT4} simulations will be provided by the \ac{AHEPaM}-team.
+\paragraph{CAU Response:} Providing several energy bands can be easily achieved. The different proton boxes introduced in the performance analysis in \cite{ahepam-djf} can be separated for different measured total energies (stopping) and deposited energies (penetrating particles). The performance analysis has shown that \acs{AHEPaM} will be able to measure protons over the entire required energy range. The amount of energy bands we can provide is only limited by statistics. The data is required to be send down at higher cadence and energy resolution not only to provide an accurate proton spectrum but for the purpose of correcting the electron spectrum. Based on this raw data, the required spectra in different resolutions as well as a deconvolution of the data based on the response functions determined form \ac{GEANT4} simulations will be provided by the \ac{AHEPaM}-team.
 
 
 
@@ -25,11 +25,11 @@ The AHEPaM shall measure proton fluxes between 0.1 GeV and 2.0 GeV in at least 5
 \label{req:R-021}
 The AHEPaM shall measure proton fluxes with a relative precision of 0.5\% at the 95.45\% confidence level.
 
-\paragraph{Justification:} Requirements for the ATHENA High Energy Particle Monitor AHEPaM [Molendi et al. 2020, issue 2.2]
+\paragraph{Justification:} Requirements for the \acf{AHEPaM} \cite[][, Molendi et al. 2020, issue 2.2]{molendi-etal-2020}
 
 \paragraph{Verification:} Analysis/Test
 
-\paragraph{Comments:} The requirement applies between any two energy bands, see the TN for further details. The requirement specifies the maximum systematic error allowed between bands. Statistical errors are covered in the other requirements.
+\paragraph{Comments:} The requirement applies between any two energy bands, see the TN for further details. The requirement specifies the maximum systematic error allowed between bands. Statistical errors are covered in the other requirements. %\ac{TN}
 
 
 \paragraph{CAU Response:} 
@@ -41,10 +41,10 @@ The AHEPaM shall measure proton fluxes with a relative precision of 0.5\% at the
 %----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 \subsection*{R-AHEPaM-023: Proton statistical accuracy}
 \label{req:R-023}
-The AHEPaM shall measure proton fluxes with a statistical accuracy of at least 1\% at the 95.45\% confidence level for a time resolution of 3 ks in at least 2 energy bands, and for a time resolution of 10 ks in at least 5 energy bands.
+The AHEPaM shall measure proton fluxes with a statistical accuracy of at least 1\% at the 95.45\% confidence level for a time resolution of 3\,ks in at least 2 energy bands, and for a time resolution of 10\,ks in at least 5 energy bands.
 
 
-\paragraph{Justification:} Requirements for the ATHENA High Energy Particle Monitor AHEPaM [Molendi et al. 2020, issue 2.2]
+\paragraph{Justification:} Requirements for the \acf{AHEPaM} \cite[][, Molendi et al. 2020, issue 2.2]{molendi-etal-2020}
 
 
 \paragraph{Verification:} Analysis/Test
@@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ The AHEPaM shall measure proton fluxes with a statistical accuracy of at least 1
 The AHEPaM shall measure electron fluxes between 0.05 GeV and 1.0 GeV in at least 5 energy bands.
 
 
-\paragraph{Justification:} Requirements for the ATHENA High Energy Particle Monitor AHEPaM [Molendi et al. 2020, issue 2.2]
+\paragraph{Justification:} Requirements for the \acf{AHEPaM} \cite[][, Molendi et al. 2020, issue 2.2]{molendi-etal-2020}
 
 
 \paragraph{Verification:} Analysis/Test
@@ -79,12 +79,12 @@ The AHEPaM shall measure electron fluxes between 0.05 GeV and 1.0 GeV in at leas
 \label{req:R-025}
 The AHEPaM shall measure electron fluxes with a relative precision of 1\% at the 95.45\% confidence level.
 
-\paragraph{Justification:} Requirements for the ATHENA High Energy Particle Monitor AHEPaM [Molendi et al. 2020, issue 2.2]
+\paragraph{Justification:} Requirements for the \acf{AHEPaM} \cite[][, Molendi et al. 2020, issue 2.2]{molendi-etal-2020}
 
 
 \paragraph{Verification:} Analysis/Test
 
-\paragraph{Comments:} The requirement applies between any two energy bands, see the TN for further details. The requirement specifies the maximum systematic error allowed between bands. Statistical errors are covered in the other requirements.
+\paragraph{Comments:} The requirement applies between any two energy bands, see the TN for further details. The requirement specifies the maximum systematic error allowed between bands. Statistical errors are covered in the other requirements. %\ac{TN}
 
 
 \paragraph{CAU Response:}
@@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ The AHEPaM shall measure electron fluxes with a relative precision of 1\% at the
 The AHEPaM shall measure electron fluxes with respect to proton fluxes measured by the AHEPaM with a relative precision of 2.5\% at the 95.45\% confidence level.
 
 
-\paragraph{Justification:} Requirements for the ATHENA High Energy Particle Monitor AHEPaM [Molendi et al. 2020, issue 2.2]
+\paragraph{Justification:} Requirements for the \acf{AHEPaM} \cite[][, Molendi et al. 2020, issue 2.2]{molendi-etal-2020}
 
 
 \paragraph{Verification:} Analysis/Test
@@ -110,9 +110,9 @@ The AHEPaM shall measure electron fluxes with respect to proton fluxes measured
 %----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 \subsection*{R-AHEPaM-027: Electrons statistical accuracy}
 \label{req:R-027}
-The AHEPaM shall measure electron fluxes with a statistical accuracy of at least 5\% at the 95.45\% confidence level for a time resolution of 3 ks in at least 2 energy bands, and 10 ks in at least 5 energy bands.
+The AHEPaM shall measure electron fluxes with a statistical accuracy of at least 5\% at the 95.45\% confidence level for a time resolution of 3\,ks in at least 2 energy bands, and 10 ks in at least 5 energy bands.
 
-\paragraph{Justification:} Requirements for the ATHENA High Energy Particle Monitor AHEPaM [Molendi et al. 2020, issue 2.2]
+\paragraph{Justification:} Requirements for the \acf{AHEPaM} \cite[][, Molendi et al. 2020, issue 2.2]{molendi-etal-2020}
 
 \paragraph{Verification:} Analysis/Test
 
@@ -127,9 +127,9 @@ This discrepancy between requirement and estimated performance has been discusse
 %----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 \subsection*{R-AHEPaM-028: Helium energy range}
 \label{req:R-028}
-The AHEPaM shall measure He ion fluxes between 1.0 GeV and 3.0 GeV in at least 1 energy band.
+The AHEPaM shall measure He ion fluxes between 1.0\,GeV and 3.0\,GeV in at least 1 energy band.
 
-\paragraph{Justification:} Requirements for the ATHENA High Energy Particle Monitor AHEPaM [Molendi et al. 2020, issue 2.2]
+\paragraph{Justification:} Requirements for the \acf{AHEPaM} \cite[][, Molendi et al. 2020, issue 2.2]{molendi-etal-2020}
 
 \paragraph{Verification:} Analysis/Test
 
@@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ The AHEPaM shall measure He ion fluxes between 1.0 GeV and 3.0 GeV in at least 1
 The AHEPaM shall measure He ion fluxes with respect to proton fluxes measured by the AHEPaM with a relative precision of 5\% at the 95.45\% confidence level.
 
 
-\paragraph{Justification:} Requirements for the ATHENA High Energy Particle Monitor AHEPaM [Molendi et al. 2020, issue 2.2]
+\paragraph{Justification:} Requirements for the \acf{AHEPaM} \cite[][, Molendi et al. 2020, issue 2.2]{molendi-etal-2020}
 
 \paragraph{Verification:} Analysis/Test
 
@@ -160,7 +160,7 @@ The AHEPaM shall measure He ion fluxes with respect to proton fluxes measured by
 \label{req:R-031}
 The AHEPaM shall measure He ion fluxes with a statistical accuracy of at least 10\% at the 95.45\% confidence level for a time resolution of 3 ks in at least 1 energy band.
 
-\paragraph{Justification:} Requirements for the ATHENA High Energy Particle Monitor AHEPaM [Molendi et al. 2020, issue 2.2]
+\paragraph{Justification:} Requirements for the \acf{AHEPaM} \cite[][, Molendi et al. 2020, issue 2.2]{molendi-etal-2020}
 
 \paragraph{Verification:} Analysis/Test
 
@@ -172,9 +172,9 @@ The AHEPaM shall measure He ion fluxes with a statistical accuracy of at least 1
 %----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 \subsection*{R-AHEPaM-032: Particle discrimination}
 \label{req:R-032}
-The AHEPaM shall provide particle discrimination between protons, He ions, and electrons with a success rate $>$95\% (\ac{TBC}) and with off-diagonal terms in the confusion matrix $<$5\% (\acs{TBC}).
+The AHEPaM shall provide particle discrimination between protons, He ions, and electrons with a success rate $>95$\% (\ac{TBC}) and with off-diagonal terms in the confusion matrix $<5$\% (\acs{TBC}).
 
-\paragraph{Justification:} Requirements for the ATHENA High Energy Particle Monitor AHEPaM [Molendi et al. 2020, issue 2.2]
+\paragraph{Justification:} Requirements for the \acf{AHEPaM} \cite[][, Molendi et al. 2020, issue 2.2]{molendi-etal-2020}
 
 \paragraph{Verification:} Analysis/Test
 
@@ -186,7 +186,7 @@ The AHEPaM shall provide particle discrimination between protons, He ions, and e
 %----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 \subsection*{R-AHEPaM-023: Maximum flux}
 \label{req:R-033}
-The \ac{AHEPaM} performance requirements shall be met for count rates up to 15 particles cm2 s-1 (\ac{TBC}). The \ac{AHEPaM} shall be functional within the requirements up to the levels given in the following table:
+The \ac{AHEPaM} performance requirements shall be met for count rates up to 15 particles cm$^2$\,s$^{-1}$ (\ac{TBC}). The \ac{AHEPaM} shall be functional within the requirements up to the levels given in the following table:
 
 \begin{center}
     \begin{tabular}{|llr|}\hline
@@ -196,17 +196,17 @@ The \ac{AHEPaM} performance requirements shall be met for count rates up to 15 p
     He ions     & 1.0 - 3.0  & $1\cdot 10^4$  [m$^2$ s sr]$^{-1}$ \\\hline
     \end{tabular}
 \end{center}
-%- 3.E5 particles/(m2 s sr)  in the 0.1-2.0 GeV band for protons;\\
+%- 3.E5 particles/(m2 s sr)  in the 0.1-2.0\,GeV band for protons;\\
-%- 3.E4 particles/(m2 s sr)  in the 0.05-1.0 GeV band for electrons; and\\
+%- 3.E4 particles/(m2 s sr)  in the 0.05-1.0\,GeV band for electrons; and\\
-% 1.E4 particles/(m2 s sr)  in the 1.0-3.0 GeV band for He ions.
+% 1.E4 particles/(m2 s sr)  in the 1.0-3.0\,GeV band for He ions.
 
-\paragraph{Justification:} Requirements for the \ac{ATHENA} High Energy Particle Monitor AHEPaM [Molendi et al. 2020, issue 2.2]
+\paragraph{Justification:} Requirements for the \acf{AHEPaM} \cite[][, Molendi et al. 2020, issue 2.2]{molendi-etal-2020}
 
 \paragraph{Verification:} Analysis/Test
 
 \paragraph{Comments:} No degraded particle counting mode is required. The AHEPaM monitor is not meant to provide alarms for Athena instruments. Functional count-rate limits are currently expressed in terms of fluxes and can be convertred into particle rates once a general design of the monitor has been provided.
 
 
-\paragraph{CAU Response:}This requirement can be easily fulfilled by the current design. The performance analysis in \cite{ahepam-djf} as well as our experiences from previous instruments (cf. \cite{ahepam-heritage}) show that the expected count rates during these high flux conditions are low enough such that our electronics can process all events. Furthermore, we plan to include an automatic switch-off of some of the SSD segments during high-flux conditions which will reduce the geometric factor and the count rates if necessary. Such a feature has been sucessfully integrated in both \ac{SOHO}/\ac{EPHIN} and Solar Orbiters \ac{HET}.
+\paragraph{CAU Response:}This requirement can be easily fulfilled by the current design. The performance analysis in \cite{ahepam-djf} as well as our experiences from previous instruments (cf. \cite{ahepam-heritage}) show that the expected count rates during these high flux conditions are low enough such that our electronics can process all events. Furthermore, we plan to include an automatic switch-off of some of the \ac{SSD} segments during high-flux conditions which will reduce the geometric factor and the count rates if necessary. Such a feature has been sucessfully integrated in both \ac{SOHO}/\ac{EPHIN} and Solar Orbiters \ac{HET}.
 
 

cau-ath-spc-0005_i1-0/cau-ath-spc-0005_i1-0.tex

@@ -212,8 +212,11 @@ A sketch of the \ac{KET} sensor head is shown in Fig~\ref{fig:Sketch-EPHIN-KET}.
 \paragraph{\ac{BEXUS}}
 The \ac{BEXUS} programme allows students from universities and higher education colleges across Europe to carry out scientific and technological experiments on research balloons. The institute had been part of the following flights: 
 \begin{description}
+
 \item[\ac{FaNS}] on \ac{BEXUS}-31. The \ac{FaNS} has been developed to determine the flux of fast neutrons within the Earth's atmosphere. The instrument consists of a boron-doped plastic scintillator which is optimized for the energy range from about 0.5~MeV to above 10~MeV \cite[]{FANS-2021}.
-\item[\ac{TANOS}] on \ac{BEXUS}-29. In order to measure thermal neutrons in the atmosphere the team developed an instrument consisting of a silicon detector stack and two layers of gadolinium foil between two detectors. The cross section of gadolinium is very high for thermal neutrons, around 49000 barn, thus this material is particularly suitable for the experiment .
+
+\item[\ac{TANOS}] on \ac{BEXUS}-29. In order to measure thermal neutrons in the atmosphere the team developed an instrument consisting of a silicon detector stack and two layers of gadolinium foil between two detectors. The cross section of gadolinium is very high for thermal neutrons, around 49000 barn, thus this material is particularly suitable for the experiment \cite[]{TANOS-2019}.
+
 \item[\ac{ADAM}] on \ac{BEXUS}-19. To determine the angular distribution of charged particles during a \ac{BEXUS} balloon flight the team developed an instrument called \ac{EVA}. It consists of \cite[]{Martensen-etal-2015}:
 \begin{itemize}
     \item a sensor head, which will include 16 silicon based \acp{SSD}, also to be referred to as photodiodes. Each of the \acp{SSD} can detect incoming particles individually causing a little voltage peak that can be read out by the second part
@@ -221,6 +224,7 @@ The \ac{BEXUS} programme allows students from universities and higher education
 \end{itemize}
 
 \item[\ac{MONSTA}] on \ac{BEXUS}-14. The team used the \ac{PING} on the stratospheric balloon to measure the height dependent flux of the neutral component. In order to determine the contribution of neutrons to the dose, it is essential to measure their altitude-dependent energy deposition spectra. The sensor head of \ac{PING} consists of two different scintillators: The inner plastic scintillator BC-412 and the surrounding inorganic scintillator CsI(Na). The scintillators are optically coupled and are read out by a common \ac{PMT}. Neutrons deposit mostly their energy in the hydrogen rich BC-412 plastic scintillator while the heavy inorganic scintillator has a high cross-section for gamma rays. Because of their different decay times, the pulses of the two scintillators have a different pulse shape. Hence, they can be separated by applying pulse shape analysis \cite[]{Scharrenberg-etal-2013}. 
+
 \item[\ac{RETA}] on \ac{BEXUS}-13. In order to investigate the radiation environment in the atmosphere  a particle telescope consisting of four segmented silicon semiconductor detectors was developed. Due to the arrangement of the detectors, it is possible to separate neutral and charged particles and the calculated dose rates can be converted into a dose equivalent rate which is the unit for radiation protection. The \ac{FRED} has successfully made such measurements onboard a stratospheric balloon \cite[]{Moeller-etal-2011}. 
 \end{description}
  

internal_docs/budget_estimation.tex

@@ -14,38 +14,53 @@
 
 \begin{document}
 \maketitle
-The Budget should reflect any further design changes, building and testing of FM, FS, PQM, EM?
+The Budget should reflect any further design changes, building and testing of PQM, FM, FS.\newline
-\section{Personal}
+Estimation is \textbf{300k€/year = 4M€} for personnel, \textbf{4~M€} for parts, testing and external services resulting in a total of \textbf{8-10~M€}.
+\section{Personnel}
 \begin{itemize}
-    \item Mechanical (Lars): X FTE months
+    \item System Engineer 
-    \item Electrical (Björn, Stephan, Vio): X FTE months
+    \item PostDoc
-    \item Management (Bob, Paddy): X FTE months
+    \item PhD candidate
-    \item Tests (Lars, Stephan, Sönke, Paddy): X FTE months
+    \item a total of 300k€/year
 \end{itemize}
 
 \section{Parts}
-\subsection{Detectors}
+\subsection{Detectors - 1M€ total}
 \begin{itemize}
-    \item SSDs - Mirrion/Canberra (Stepahn fragt nach): XXX k€
+    \item SSDs - Mirrion/Canberra (Stepahn fragt nach): 410 k€
+    \begin{itemize}
+        \item Kaffeeraumabschätzung: 
+        \item Masken: 50k€/Maske - 100k€
+        \item 50k€ pro großem Stack - 200k€ / unit
+        \item SSD-Total: $\approx \approx \approx$ 900k€
+    \end{itemize}
     \item BGOs - Saint-Gobain (Bob): 90k€ (12 units a 7.7k€/unit)
     \item Aerogel - Aerogel Factory  (Bernd): 10k€ (12 units a 800€/unit)
-    \item Carrier - Leiton (Stephan): X * 1k€
 \end{itemize}
-\subsection{Electronics}
+\subsection{Electronics - 2.2M€ total}
 \begin{itemize}
-    \item ?
+    \item FM+FS+PQM: 2.2M€
+    \item FS+FM: 1.6M€
+    \item EM FPGA (DM+): 30k€
 \end{itemize}
-\subsection{Mechanical}
+\subsection{Mechanical 60k€ total}
 \begin{itemize}
-    \item ?
+    \item roughly 20k€ per unit (see Lars Table on asterix)
 \end{itemize}
-\subsection{Tests}
+\section{Tests - 80k€ total}
 \begin{itemize}
-    \item CERN electron - travel costs only - 3 people, 1 week, $\approx$ 2k€
+    \item CERN electron - travel costs only - 3 people, 1 week, $\approx$ 3k€
-    \item CERN proton - travel costs only - 3 people, 1 week, $\approx$ 2k€
+    \item CERN proton - travel costs only - 3 people, 1 week, $\approx$ 3k€
-    \item DAISY - travel costs only - 3 people, 1 week, $\approx$ 2k€
+    \item DAISY - travel costs only - 3 people, 1 week, $\approx$ 3k€
-    \item HIMAC calibration - travel costs only - 3 people, 1 week, $\approx$ 5k€
+    \item HIMAC calibration - travel costs only - 3 people, 1 week, $\approx$ 10k€
-    \item MPL/ESTEC/?? - shake n bake?
+    \item Random Vibration - 10k€ / unit
+    \item Thermal Balance - 10k€ / unit
+\end{itemize}
+
+\section{External services - 300k€ total}
+\begin{itemize}
+    \item soldering etc. - 100k€
+    \item PA/QA - 200k€
 \end{itemize}
 
 

internal_docs/upm.tex

@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ Gustavo Rodrigo, Ignacio Torralbo, Andres Garcia Perez, \ls \pk
 \begin{itemize}
     \item \ls gibt bis Mi Abend CAD an UPM
     \item \ls \rfws \bs \pk Dienstag 21.02 12:00 Uhr - clearification Meeting mit UPM
-    \item Gustavo: ~ 1 Monat für "simple model", deadline 24.03
+    \item Gustavo: ~ 1 Monat für ``simple model'', deadline 24.03
     \item UPM überdenkt budget
 \end{itemize}
 

procedures/assembly.tex

@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@
 \maketitle
 This procedures describes the assembly of the AHEPaM DM/FM. \newline
 Section 1 gives some clarifications/definitions regarding the naming scheme.\newline
-The procedure is splited in three parts,
+The procedure is split in three parts,
 \begin{itemize}
     \item Detector assembly (section 2, 4 weeks total)
     \item Preamp board assembly (section 3, 3 weeks total (1.5 weeks for DM))

shared/ahepam-acronyms.tex

@@ -1,13 +1,13 @@
 % This file is used by more than one document. Edit with care.
 % Usage: \acs{PMT} --> PMT, \acp{PMT} --> PMTs, \acl{PMT} --> Photo-Multiplier Tube
-\begin{acronym}[DMGSER]
+\begin{acronym}[DMGSER] %[longest acronym used as width parameter]
   \acro{ABCL}{As-Built Configuration List}
   \acro{AC}{Alternating Current}
-  \acro{ACR}{Anomalous Cosmic Rays}
+  \acro{ACR}{Anomalous Cosmic Ray}\acroplural{ACR}[ACR]{Anomalous Cosmic Rays}  %\acp{ACR}
   \acro{AD}{Applicable Document}
   \acro{ADAM}{Angular Distribution of charged particles, Atmosphere Measurement}
   \acro{ADC}{Analog to Digital Converter/Conversion}
-  \acro{AHEPaM}{Athena High-Energy Particle Monitor}
+  \acro{AHEPaM}{\acs{ATHENA} High-Energy Particle Monitor}
   \acro{AIT}{Assembly, Integration and Test}
   \acro{AIV}{Assembly, Integration and Verification}
   \acro{AKE}{Absolute Knowledge Error}
@@ -38,6 +38,7 @@
   \acro{CE}{Conducted Emission}
   \acro{CERN}{Conseil Européen pour la Recherche Nucléaire (European Organization for Nuclear Research)}
   \acro{CERF}{\acs{CERN}-\acs{EU} high-energy Reference Field}
+  \acro{CHAOS}{CHerenkov Atmospheric Observation System}
   \acro{CHKV}{Cherenkov Detector}
   \acro{CI}{Configuration Item}
   \acro{CIDL}{Configuration Item Data List}
@@ -124,8 +125,8 @@
   \acro{FS}{Flight Spare}
   \acro{FTA}{Fault Tree Analysis}
   \acro{FWHM}{Full Width at Half Maximum}
-  \acro{GCR}{Galactic Cosmic Ray}
+  \acro{GCR}{Galactic Cosmic Ray}\acroplural{GCR}[GCR]{Galactic Cosmic Rays} %\acp{GCR}
-  \acro{GEANT4}{GEometry ANd Tracking 4/ Toolkit for the simulation of the passage of particles through matter}
+  \acro{GEANT4}{GEometry ANd Tracking 4 (Toolkit for the simulation of the passage of particles through matter)}
   \acro{GMM}{Geometrical Mathematical Model}
   \acro{GSE}{Ground Support Equipment}
   \acro{HET}{High-Energy Telescope}
@@ -223,6 +224,7 @@
   \acro{QMB}{Quartz Micro Balance}
   \acro{RAD}{Radiation Assessment Detector on MSL}
   \acro{RAM}{Random Access Memory}
+  \acro{RDM}{Radiation Design Margin}
   \acro{RE}{Radiated Emission}
   \acro{RETA}{Radiation Exposure in The Atmosphere}
   \acro{RfD}{Request for Deviation}
@@ -265,7 +267,7 @@
   \acro{STEREO}{Solar TErrestrial RElations Observatory}
   \acro{STM}{Structural and Thermal Model}
   \acro{SW}{Software}
-  \acro{TANOS}{Thermal atmospheric neutron observation system}
+  \acro{TANOS}{Thermal Atmospheric Neutron Observation System}
   \acro{TAD}{Top Assembly Drawing}
   \acro{TBC}{To Be Confirmed}
   \acro{TBD}{To Be Defined}
@@ -298,3 +300,4 @@
   \acro{X-IFU}{X-ray Integral Field Unit}
   \acro{XMM}{X-ray Multi-Mirror}
 \end{acronym}
+%in au-ath-req-0004: %\ac{TN} %\ac{OP}   %\acs{DMM} %\ac{NOP} %\ac{MUA} %\ac{SVM} \ac{SA} \ac{HDRM} 

shared/sample.bib

@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ keywords = {applicable},
 }
 
 @techreport{ahepam-schedule,
-author = {P.Kuehl/ AHEPam Project Team},
+author = {P.Kuehl/ AHEPaM Project Team},
 title = {AHEPaM/ DM Project Schedule},
 number = {CAU-ATH-SCH-0001\_i1-1},
 note = {Issue 1.0},
@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ keywords = {applicable, reference},
 }
 
 @techreport{ahepam-req,
-author = {L. Seimetz/ AHEPam Project Team},
+author = {L. Seimetz/ AHEPaM Project Team},
 title = {AHEAPaM Systems Requirements Document},
 number = {cau-ath-req-0004},
 note = {Issue 1.0},
@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ keywords = {applicable},
 }
 
 @techreport{ahepam-heritage,
-author = {B. Heber/ AHEPam Project Team},
+author = {B. Heber/ AHEPaM Project Team},
 title = {AHEPaM Heritage File},
 number = {cau-ath-ddc-0005},
 note = {Issue 1.0},
@@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ keywords = {applicable},
 }
 
 @techreport{ahepam-ddf,
-author = {L. Seimetz/ AHEPam Project Team},
+author = {L. Seimetz/ AHEPaM Project Team},
 title = {AHEPaM Design Definition File (DDF)},
 number = {cau-ath-ddc-0006},
 note = {Issue 1.0},
@@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ keywords = {applicable},
 }
 
 @techreport{ahepam-djf,
-author = {L. Seimetz/ AHEPam Project Team},
+author = {L. Seimetz/ AHEPaM Project Team},
 title = {AHEPaM Design Justification File (DJF)},
 number = {cau-ath-ddc-0007},
 note = {Issue 1.0},
@@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ keywords = {applicable},
 }
 
 @techreport{ahepam-ddv,
-author = {L. Seimetz/ AHEPam Project Team},
+author = {L. Seimetz/ AHEPaM Project Team},
 title = {AHEPaM Design, Development and Verification Plan (DDVP)},
 number = {cau-ath-pla-0008},
 note = {Issue 1.0},
@@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ keywords = {applicable},
 }
 
 @techreport{ahepam-sr,
-author = {L. Seimetz/ AHEPam Project Team},
+author = {L. Seimetz/ AHEPaM Project Team},
 title = {AHEPaM System Requirements},
 number = {cau-ath-pla-0004},
 note = {Issue 1.0},
@@ -163,7 +163,7 @@ keywords = {applicable},
 }
 
 @techreport{dpl,
-author = {L. Seimetz/ AHEPam Project Team},
+author = {L. Seimetz/ AHEPaM Project Team},
 title = {Declared Process List},
 number = {cau-ath-lst-0012},
 note = {Issue 1.0},
@@ -172,7 +172,7 @@ keywords = {applicable},
 }
 
 @techreport{dcl,
-author = {B. Schuster/ AHEPam Project Team},
+author = {B. Schuster/ AHEPaM Project Team},
 title = {Declared Components List},
 number = {cau-ath-lst-0015},
 note = {Issue 1.0},
@@ -181,7 +181,7 @@ keywords = {applicable},
 }
 
 @techreport{dml,
-author = {L. Seimetz/ AHEPam Project Team},
+author = {L. Seimetz/ AHEPaM Project Team},
 title = {Declared Materials List},
 number = {cau-ath-lst-0013},
 note = {Issue 1.0},
@@ -190,7 +190,7 @@ keywords = {applicable},
 }
 
 @techreport{dmpl,
-author = {L. Seimetz/ AHEPam Project Team},
+author = {L. Seimetz/ AHEPaM Project Team},
 title = {Declared Mechanical Parts List},
 number = {cau-ath-lst-0014},
 note = {Issue 1.0},
@@ -199,7 +199,7 @@ keywords = {applicable},
 }
 
 @techreport{ahepam-micd,
-author = {L. Seimetz/ AHEPam Project Team},
+author = {L. Seimetz/ AHEPaM Project Team},
 title = {AHEPaM DM-Mechanical Interface Control Document},
 number = {cau-ath-icd-0011},
 note = {Issue 1.0},
@@ -226,7 +226,7 @@ keywords = {applicable},
 }
 
 @techreport{moms-12-05-2022,
-author = {R. Wimmer-Schwingruber/ AHEPam Project Team},
+author = {R. Wimmer-Schwingruber/ AHEPaM Project Team},
 title = {MOMs ESA-CAU AHEPaM Progress Meeting, May 12, 2022},
 year = {},
 keywords = {applicable},
@@ -601,7 +601,7 @@ archivePrefix = {arXiv},
         pages = {2342},
        adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ICRC...33.2342S},
       adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System},
-      keywords ={reference}
+      keywords ={reference,MONSTA}
 }
 
 @INPROCEEDINGS{Martensen-etal-2015,
@@ -616,7 +616,7 @@ archivePrefix = {arXiv},
         pages = {535},
        adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ESASP.730..535M},
       adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System},
-      keywords ={reference}
+      keywords ={reference,ADAM}
 }
 @INPROCEEDINGS{Moeller-etal-2011,
        author = {{M{\"o}ller}, T. and {Ehresmann}, B. and {Labrenz}, J. and {Panitzsch}, L.},
@@ -630,24 +630,27 @@ archivePrefix = {arXiv},
         pages = {641-644},
        adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ESASP.700..641M},
       adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System},
-      keywords ={reference}
+      keywords ={reference,RETA}
 }
 
 @misc{FANS-2021,
     author = {Wallmann, C.},
-    year = {2022},
+    year = {2021},
-    title = {BEXUS 30/31},
+    title = {Fast Neutron Spectrometer on BEXUS 31},
-    subtitle = {Fact Sheet N°282},
+    subtitle = {},
-    url = {https://sscspace.com/blog/2021/09/29/bexus-30-31/},
+    url = {https://sscspace.com/bexus-30-31},
     note = {Accessed = 2022-09-13},
     keywords ={reference}
 }
+%subtitle = {Fact Sheet N°282}, url = {https://sscspace.com/blog/2021/09/29/bexus-30-31/}
+%SED: url = {https://rexusbexus.net/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/BX31_FANS_SED_v4-0s_15Aug21.pdf}
+
 @misc{TANOS-2019,
-    author = {Martensen-2019},
+    author = {Zumkeller, J.},
     year = {2019},
-    title = {BEXUS 28/29},
+    title = {Thermal Atmospheric Neutron Observation System on BEXUS 29},
-    subtitle = {Fact Sheet N°282},
+    subtitle = {},
-    url = {https://sscspace.com/blog/2021/09/29/bexus-30-31/},
+    url = {www.bexus.org/index.php/tanos},
-    note = {Accessed = 2022-09-13},
+    note = {Accessed = 2023-06-02},
     keywords ={reference}
-}
+}%http://tanos.bexus.org