1
0
Fork 0

Compare commits

..

2 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Lars Seimetz
95816a92f5 Update on Overleaf. 2024-07-30 14:05:34 +00:00
Lars Seimetz
c9fa772f51 Update on Overleaf. 2024-07-30 13:04:37 +00:00

View file

@ -240,12 +240,4 @@ We have assessed the \acs{TRL} of the critical subsystems of \acs{AHEPaM} in Tab
\end{table} \end{table}
\section{Next steps} \section{Next steps}
\subsection{Mechanical Design} While the general design and assembly concept of the \acs{DM} worked out as expected, some aspects could be improved and should be revised. During assembly it was e.g. found that although the Cerenkov detector chassis could be integrated without difficulties besides the BGO sub-assembly, the space between the detectors is generally too small to allow for an adequate safety distance towards the following structural part. Consequently the spacing between the detectors should be increased, allowing for improved assembly, overall reducing risks during the integration. Moreover the electrical shielding inside the PMT chassis needs to be improved in order to reduce electronics noise. Less priority aspects like limiting the number of used screw drive types and revising the Cerenkov detector springs towards better machinability do not directly affect the performance of \acs{AHEPaM}, but will overall lead to an improved instrument design.
\enumerate
\item Spring use in Cerenkov detector mounting should be revised.
{\bf more space, too many kinds of nuts and bolts...}