Merge branch 'commented' of ssh://forge.bexus.org:22/verena/sw-k-means into commented

.gitignore

@@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
+paper/*blg
+paper/*out
 data
 *.pickle
 results
@@ -6,6 +8,5 @@ montecarlo
 paper/*log
 paper/*aux
 paper/*bbl
-paper/*blg
 paper/*pdf
 __pycache__

paper/coverletter.tex

@@ -122,6 +122,7 @@ Lines 69-71: Maybe this sentence referring to charge states could be moved to/me
 \reply{This is a great suggestion.}
 
 \commentB{Lines 84-91}{ Suggest breaking up this long sentence with multiple parentheses.}
+
 \reply{This was indeed a very long sentence. We shortend it }
 
 Line 91: "In the absence of ..." - Further context could be provided for this comment. I suspect this refers to the partial failure of the ACE/SWICS instrument in 2011. Also, if I recall, Xu and Borovsky didn't use charge states in their classification because of the lack of SWICS data at the time they made their study but so that they could use the more extended set of standard solar wind parameters for their analysis as charge states are only available for a limited period of near-earth solar wind observations.
@@ -408,7 +409,7 @@ The study is potentially interesting but, in my opinion, the methodology, result
   similar review in \citet{khoshgoftaar2013survey} addss search based feture selection
 
   example with ACO: \citet{al2005feature}.
-  
+  example for feature importance (single features) \citet{zhuang2019decision} with good comparison \citet{saarela2021comparison}
 \citet{law2004simultaneous}  ``Both approaches, filters and wrappers, usually involve
 combinatorial searches through the space of possible
 feature subsets; for this task, different types of heuristics,